Skip to main content
Sign In
  • Home
  • Legislation
  • Calendar
  • City Council
  • Departments
  • People
Loading...
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]## ##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]## ##LOC[Cancel]##
  • Details
  • Reports

Legislation Details

File #: 26-0344    Version: 1 Name: Authorizing and Requesting an Opinion From the Attorney General of the State of Alabama Regarding the City's Record Retention Obligations for Audio and Video Recordings of City Council Meetings
Type: Resolution Status: Adopted
File created: 6/23/2026 In control: City Council
On agenda: 7/6/2026 Final action: 7/6/2026
Title: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foley, Alabama, Authorizing and Requesting an Opinion From the Attorney General of the State of Alabama Regarding the City's Record Retention Obligations for Audio and Video Recordings of City Council Meetings
  • History (1)
  • Text
  • 1 record
  • Group
    • Clear sorting
    • Clear grouping
    • Group by Date
    • Group by Action By
  • Export
    • Export to Excel
    • Export to PDF
    • Export to Word
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
7/6/20261 City Council    Not available Meeting details Not available
Title
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Foley, Alabama, Authorizing and Requesting an Opinion From the Attorney General of the State of Alabama Regarding the City's Record Retention Obligations for Audio and Video Recordings of City Council Meetings


Body
WHEREAS, the City of Foley, Alabama (the "City") is considering whether to begin video recording its City Council meetings, whether to livestream those meetings through a third-party platform such as YouTube, or both; and

WHEREAS, before adopting a records management policy governing such recordings, the City Council requires authoritative guidance on the City's record retention obligations under applicable Alabama law; and

WHEREAS, the Alabama Department of Archives and History ("ADAH") municipal Records Disposition Authority ("RDA"), the existing State law, and other sources leave unclear the municipal record retention requirements and obligations that the City may face if it were to commence creating video recordings of its meetings; and

WHEREAS, neither the RDA nor any existing written guidance from ADAH or the Office of the Attorney General addresses: (1) whether a recording archived exclusively on a third-party platform such as YouTube satisfies the City's minimum retention obligation under RDA Record No. 1.04; (2) whether the City's retention obligations differ depending on whether the City records meetings internally, livestreams through a third-party platform, or does both; (3) whether the City's retention obligation is satisfied if a third-party archived recording becomes unavailable before the meeting minutes are approved through no act of the City; (4) whether a YouTube channel or similar platform through which the City livestreams Council meetings constitutes a "social media site" subject to the permanent record disposition under RDA Record No. 18.18, and if so, whether that obligation supersedes or supplements RDA Record No. 1.04; and (5) whether an advanced recording that displa...

Click here for full text
Legislation Text
Legislation Details
Legislation Details (With Text)